Compare
Where they’re strong. Where Kosha is different.
Every platform here is a serious product used by serious organisations. We would rather you choose well than choose us — so these comparisons are factual, sourced and dated.
At a glance
| Capability | Kosha | OpenText | SharePoint | M-Files | Box | Laserfiche | ProjectWise / Aconex |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Published per-user pricing | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | Partial | Partial |
| On-premises deployment | Yes | Yes | Server edition | Yes | No | Yes | ProjectWise |
| Air-gapped with local generative AI | Yes | Off-cloud option | No | Not evidenced | No | Not evidenced | No |
| Transmittals & review codes | Yes | Industry solution | Add-on | Partial | No | No | Yes |
| Deliverable registers (MDR/VDR) | Yes | Industry solution | Add-on | Partial | No | No | Partial / Yes |
| Part 11-style e-signatures | Enterprise | Yes | Partial | Yes | Partial | Partial | Partial / No |
| Records retention & legal hold | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Partial |
| AI Q&A with citations | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Partial |
| Free external collaborators | Yes | No | Guest access | Hubshare | Plan-dependent | Portal | Aconex: yes |
Best-effort assessment of each vendor’s mainstream offering from public documentation, October 2026. “Industry solution” / “Add-on” means available through a separate module, product or partner. Capabilities change — check with each vendor.
Documentum CM / D2, Extended ECM, Core Content, Content Aviator
Kosha vs OpenText Documentum & Content Management
The most established enterprise ECM platform, widely used in life sciences, energy, engineering and government for decades.
Where OpenText is strong
- Very deep, proven object model: types, aspects, virtual documents, lifecycles and version branching.
- Mature records management (DoD 5015.2 certified Records Manager), physical records and security clearances.
- Large ecosystem of industry solutions (Life Sciences, Capital Projects) and SAP / Microsoft 365 integrations.
- Content Aviator AI, including off-cloud deployment options and agentic capabilities (26.2).
Where Kosha is different
- Published per-user prices versus quote-only licensing; Sovereign perpetual at $840/user versus $1,154 for Documentum Platform + D2 on a public contract price list.
- Flat 20% AMC with no escalator for 5 years (the public contract lists 23% in year 1 plus 5% per year).
- Lifecycle-driven access and engineering document control out of the box — configured in days, not built on a platform.
- Local AI models included in the on-prem edition; OpenText states Aviator is included at no cost when you move to Content Cloud.
Pricing reference: Quote-only commercially. Washington State DES contract (Mar 2026): Documentum Platform $632 + D2 $522 per user perpetual; maintenance 23% Yr-1 + 5%/yr.
Sources: OpenText Documentum release blog · WA DES OpenText price list (2026-03-18) · OpenText Content Aviator
M-Files (Essentials / Enterprise), Aino, Hubshare, Compliance Kit
Kosha vs M-Files
A metadata-driven DMS (“what, not where”), strong in professional services, manufacturing and ISO-certified quality teams.
Where M-Files is strong
- Metadata-driven views and object relationships that remove folder dependence.
- Aino AI included in cloud editions; Metadata Agent suggests classification on upload.
- Compliance Kit for version-specific permissions and electronic signatures.
- Strong Office, Outlook and Teams integration; Hubshare external portal.
Where Kosha is different
- Engineering vocabulary built in: transmittals, deliverable registers, review codes, holds, tag numbers.
- Published pricing: Kosha Enterprise $30 vs. an estimated ~$65 per user per month for M-Files Essentials.
- Every capability is a switch, with a full self-service configuration export.
- Sovereign edition with local AI for air-gapped sites.
Pricing reference: No public price list; third-party estimate ~$65 per user per month (Essentials), Enterprise quote-only.
Sources: CostBench — M-Files (Jun 2026) · dbi-services — M-Files AI
Box Enterprise / Enterprise Plus / Enterprise Advanced, Box AI, Shield, Governance
Kosha vs Box
A leading cloud content platform with excellent external collaboration and a fast-growing AI and agent stack.
Where Box is strong
- Best-in-class external sharing and 1,500+ integrations.
- Box AI, Box Extract and Box Automate for agentic workflows.
- Shield classification and threat detection; Governance retention and legal hold.
- Unlimited storage from Business tier upward.
Where Kosha is different
- Controlled-document lifecycle: numbering, mandatory checklists, Performer → Reviewer → Approver, issue, recall and controlled revisions.
- Engineering document control (transmittals, registers, review codes) built in.
- On-premises and air-gapped deployment; Box is cloud-only.
- Kosha Enterprise at $30 vs. Box Enterprise Plus at $50 per user per month list.
Pricing reference: Enterprise $35, Enterprise Plus ~$50 per user per month (annual); AI Units included by tier.
Sources: box.com/pricing · usagepricing.com — Box blueprint
Laserfiche Cloud / self-hosted, Smart Fields, Smart Chat
Kosha vs Laserfiche
A mid-market ECM and process-automation suite, popular with government, education and finance.
Where Laserfiche is strong
- Strong forms, BPMN workflow and capture (Quick Fields, Import Agent).
- DoD 5015.2 records management.
- Smart Fields AI extraction and Smart Chat document Q&A.
- Cloud and self-hosted options via an established VAR network.
Where Kosha is different
- Engineering document control and transmittals built in.
- Lifecycle-driven access rather than folder security.
- Local AI models for air-gapped deployment.
- Published pricing: Kosha Enterprise $30 vs. third-party estimates of $79–93 for Laserfiche Cloud Business.
Pricing reference: Third-party estimates: Professional ~$69–73, Business ~$79–93 per user per month; verify with Laserfiche.
Sources: Laserfiche 2025 releases · Capterra — Laserfiche pricing
ProjectWise (incl. Deliverables Management), Oracle Aconex
Kosha vs Bentley ProjectWise & Oracle Aconex
The engineering specialists: ProjectWise for design work-in-progress, Aconex as the multi-party common data environment on mega-projects.
Where ProjectWise / Aconex is strong
- ProjectWise: CAD work-in-progress, reference/xref management and deep MicroStation/AutoCAD integration.
- Aconex: neutral multi-party CDE, structured project mail, supplier documents and review matrices.
- Both have long track records on large infrastructure and energy projects.
- Aconex’s owner-pays model lets other project parties join free.
Where Kosha is different
- One system for owner/EPC document control plus enterprise records, security classification and governed AI — not a project-only silo.
- Recall of an issued transmittal, with a reason on record.
- On-premises and air-gapped deployment with local AI.
- Kosha does not replace CAD work-in-progress tools; it complements them as the controlled-document system of record.
Pricing reference: ProjectWise (India list): ₹63,360 per licence per year; Aconex is quote-only (third-party: ~$1k–10k+ per project per month).
Sources: Bentley ProjectWise · Aconex help — transmittals · Redress Compliance — Aconex licensing
All product names, logos and brands are property of their respective owners and are used here for identification only. Kosha is not affiliated with or endorsed by any vendor named on this page. Information is drawn from public sources available in October 2026, may be incomplete or out of date, and is not a statement about any vendor’s suitability for your needs. To report an inaccuracy, contact us and we will correct it promptly.
Run a side-by-side in your own browser.
The live demo runs the real Kosha engine inside your browser — no sign-up, and nothing you upload leaves your machine.